Azimuth and Altitude Part 1

We can define the position of a celestial body in relation to its local hour angle and declination.  We can also state its position in relation to our own celestial meridian and celestial horizon; in other words, in terms of its azimuth and altitude from our position.

The Azimuth is similar to the bearing in that it is the angle between the observer’s meridian and the direction of the celestial body.  However, whereas bearings are measured clockwise from north from 0o to 360o, azimuth is measured from 0o to 180o from either north or south.  If the observer is in the northern hemisphere, the azimuth is measured from north and if in the southern hemisphere, it is measured from south.

For example, in the following diagram,

diag 21 (1)

O is the position of an observer on the Earth’s surface and NOS represents the observer’s meridian.

X is the position of a celestial body and in terms of bearing, the direction of X from point O is 045o.

In terms of azimuth it is either N45oE for an observer is in the northern hemisphere or S135oE for an observer in the southern hemisphere.

The altitude is the angle between the celestial horizon and the direction of the celestial body.  (The celestial horizon is the projection of the observer’s horizon onto the celestial sphere).

As shown in the next diagram, the observer measures the altitude in relation to the visible horizon from his position at O on the Earth’s surface.  So, the observed altitude is the angle HOX.  However, the true altitude is measured from the Earth’s centre in relation to the celestial horizon and is the angle RCX.


Point O will be approximately 6367 Km. from the centre of the Earth and so it would seem that the visible horizon is bound to be slightly offset from the celestial horizon.  Because of the vast distances of the stars and the planets from the Earth, we can assume that, in their cases, the celestial horizon and the visible horizon correspond with very little error.  However, in the cases of the Sun and the Moon, which are relatively near, a correction called Parallax must be added.  The subject of Parallax error and other corrections will be dealt with in greater detail in a later post.

The next post in this series will explain the place of azimuth and altitude in the theory of astro navigation.

Links:  Azimuth and Altitude Part 2     Azimuth and Altitude Part 3

It is possible only to give a brief outline of this topic here but an in-depth treatment is given in my book Astro Navigation Demystified.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s